| Home | About Us | Contact Us | ||||||
Top US Undergraduate Acting Programs
"What are the best acting schools?" You're right that if you truly want to succeed as an actor, you'll need to get excellent training. There's nothing wrong with getting a good liberal arts education at a school that also offers acting classes, but if you really want to immerse yourself in training, then you'll want to attend one of the leading drama programs in the country. I asked my acting coaches and some professional actors what they think are the best schools. The results of this non-scientific poll are below.
Top Undergraduate Acting Programs: 1. SUNY - Purchase The Conservatory of Theatre Arts and Film at Purchase College is a highly competitive and intensive program. The campus also contains a great liberal arts and design program and is only 40 minutes from New York City. But you won't have much time to explore Manhattan: Classes generally start at 8am and you'll be busy with rehearsals until 11 at night. Your first two years are considered a "trial" period. If you don't have the required skills and professionalism, you won't be asked back. This is a tough school - but it also has one of the finest acting programs in the country. 2. Juilliard Juilliard is one of the world-class acting schools in New York City (the other is at NYU). Its Drama Division was founded in 1968 by the American director and producer John Houseman and the French director, teacher, and actor Michel Saint-Denis. Over 1,000 candidates apply each year for just 20 freshman spots. Like SUNY-Purchase, Rutgers and NYU, Julliard employs a "conservatory training" approach. This means that you will work closely over four years with the same students and professors, deeply immersed within a rigorously prepared program. 3. Rutgers Many of my coaches recommended the BFA at Rutger's Mason Gross School of the Arts in New Jersey. This program, according to its brochure, "offers a BFA designed for those students who are seeking to integrate both a rigorous professional training program in a liberal arts setting. The curricula of the school gives such students a thorough and rigorous education as artists and, through the required liberal arts courses, humanistic perspectives on both their art and themselves. Junior students in Acting spend a year abroad at the Rutgers Conservatory at Shakespeare's Globe in London. This is the only BFA program which offers sequential conservatory training in London." A chance to study at the Globe alone makes this a program to celebrate. 4. Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh offers a four-year undergraduate acting program as well as the possibility of double-majoring in musical theater. Both programs train actors by immersing them in "sophisticated, verbally complex material with a focus on the works of Chekhov and Shakespeare." Sounds fascinating. In the junior year, the focus switches to Greek and Restoration drama. In the senior year, students participate in public performances on the school's main stage. Finally, for those students "in good standing," showcase performances in New York City and Los Angeles are arranged. 5. New York University - The Tisch School of Drama NYU's Tisch School has given birth to scores of great theater professionals. The undergraduate program in acting includes standard conservatory training and theater study, and is complemented with other liberal arts classes from New York University. According to Arthur Bartow, the Artistic Director of the Department of Drama, "The extraordinary synergism created by placing committed students with our professional conservatory faculty propels students forward, formulating their own unique way of working.... We are preparing people for a lifetime of creative output." 6. North Carolina School of the Arts The School of Drama at the North Carolina School of the Arts boasts such alumni as Mary-Louise Parker (Proof), Jada Pinkett Smith (The Matrix), and Terrence Mann (Beauty and the Beast). The school emphasizes "classical values in its training process to meet a well-recognized demand for actors to be technically skilled and, at the same time, creatively inspired." 7. Northwestern Northwestern offers a versatile drama program that is good for students who want flexibility in constructing their own curriculum. It is an interdepartmental program, and students take courses in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Speech. "The goal of the curriculum is to provide both historical breadth and particular insight into the relationship between dramatic texts and the performative dimensions and skills that have brought them to life." 8. California Institute of the Arts (Cal Arts) The Los Angeles based CalArts School of Theater's mission is to "expose students to theater traditions from a global cultural perspective and...to nurture non-mainstream voices and promote a cultural and aesthetic diversity of viewpoint, experience and expression." A few things set the school apart (besides its great location for people wanting to work in film or television). That includes a requirement to take up to 40% of your classes in the School of Critical Studies. These courses (some of which may be theater related) are intended to provide "broad knowledge and cultural sophistication needed for successful arts careers in today's world." CalArts also has a great center for the study of puppetry and a new theater (the REDCAT) in downtown Los Angeles. Alumni include Bill Irwin, David Hasselhoff, and Ed Harris. 9. Yale Yale is one of the world's great institutions of learning. It offers an undergraduate Theater Studies major within the department of humanities. This program differs from others in that it focuses less on performance than on theory and the history of theater and in immersing the student in liberal arts curricula. Or, as their website puts it: "Students who major in Theater Studies are encouraged to use the theater with a more fully developed sense of context and purpose than is usual in a purely technical course of study. Courses are distributed to help ensure that students understand the theater as part of the intellectual life of the culture it interprets and reflects." A degree from Yale definitely opens doors in the theater world. 10. UC San Diego The UCSD Department of Theatre and Dance offers both a major and minor. You do not need to apply specifically to the Department of Theatre and Dance or audition for the program - any student accepted to UCSD can claim a theater major. While it is mainly known for its graduate program (with ties to La Jolla Playhouse), the UCSD undergraduate program provides a broad base of knowledge in the fine arts, supplemented with practical experience on the stage. Another advantage of studying at UCSD is that it also has a noteworthy film studies center. Honorable Mentions: The following schools have strong acting programs: University of Miami (FL), University of Indiana at Evansville, University of Minnesota (with ties to the Guthrie Theater), UT - Austin, Hofstra University, UC Irvine, Boston University, DePaul University, and Emerson College. I also know several excellent actors who attended the theater arts program at UC-Santa Cruz. "Actor Tips" is copyright 2006 by Chad Gracia and ActorTips.com, Inc. All rights reserved. For more articles on acting, as well as free monologues and acting supplies, visit www.actortips.com. Related Articles
More Articles by Chad Gracia
Reader Comments I am an agent for one of the biggest agency's in the business. We are bicoastal (NY & LA ) as well as London. I happened to trip on this site and would like to add a comment for actors looking at schools. I absolutely agree that we first consider actors who went to the schools on the list. However, whoever made the list is clearly unaware that Boston University's program should not be on the honorable mention list. BU's undergrad program is on the level of SUNY, North Carolina and Carnegie Mellon. These are conservatory schools. North Western, NYU undergrad and Rutgers are very good programs and excellent liberal arts schools but are not as competitive. NYU's Graduate Program, Yale Grad and Julliard are at the very top. As well as many schools in the UK such as RADA and Central School of Speech. The honorable mention schools are very general because I would take a look at an actor who had DePaul's Grad School on there resume, But I may not waste my time with someone from Emerson. This is assuming they are right out of school and haven't really worked yet. Some of the other ones, forget it. But BU I would immediately see an actor from there. They graduate few and are at this moment some of the best in the business. That particular school has a high percentage of graduates from the past 5-10 years working on TV alone. For example, Kim Raver, Anthony Ruivivar, Emily Dechanel, Cynthia Watros, Yunjin Kim, Maura West. As well as, Marisa Tomei, Faye Dunaway, Jason Alexander, Julianne Moore just to name a few. It is important for young actor today to understand, agents and casting directors look at well educated actors with a strong well rounded work ethic. It is not to say if you went to a small NY or LA studio program that you would not have a shot. The truth is if you have a great photo and look interesting I might take a look at you. However, agents generally know that when you come out of BU, SUNY, NC, Julliard, ACT( another good one) Carnegie, that you are among the best and you're probably are not going to waste my valuable time. Hope this was helpful and good luck to all! Posted by B. Ryder (2007-12-01) 8 What about the University of Michigan's Theatre department? I know the Musical theatre department is highly regarded among agents, but what about its acting/theatre graduates? Posted by B. Williams (2008-01-05) 19 I agree with the 12.01.97 posting of B Ryder whole heartedly! B U's actor training program consistantly graduates the most competitive, competend and creative actors in the field. My question is, why has your web listing not been changed to reflect this?
Thanks, K Posted by K Thompson (2008-01-12) 23 I strongly disagree with the 12.01.07 posting of B Ryder immensely. Why does it matter where you get your "training" from? It is the institutional types like you that give acting a bad name. If someone has experience and can really ACT, then why bypass them for someone who cant and has Juilliard on their resume. Just because a person graduates from an Intense conservatory program doesnt mean that their a good actor. You say that they are more "competitive" but a competitive spirit and a lack of talent dont even up. I've watched actors from Yale, SUNY, NC, and Carnigie Mellon and most of them SUCKED!!! All of these so called "great acting schools" are paramount in cost. The bottom line: It DOESN'T MATTER WHERE YOU GET YOUR TRAINING FROM. JUST ACT!! Posted by Chad Robbins (2008-01-30) 27 B. Ryder (2007-12-01) used "on there resume" when s/he meant "their," while Chad Robbins (2008-01-30) said "their a good actor" when s/he meant "they're." I know that it doesn't matter orally -- they're, there and their all rhyme on stage -- but most junior high school students know the difference! Posted by I'm a good acter, bad spellar (2008-02-18) 42 What B. Ryder is saying is that while NOT going to one of these programs does not mean that you are a bad actor, going to these programs assures agents that you have not only had good training, but also have beat out thousands of other applicants in earning a spot at one of these programs, so generally you are talented. I disagree with Chad Robbins for saying that actors from these programs cannot act, many of them are great...this is not saying that they are necessarily the best, but still...
Training is important. Many of the best actors have trained in undergraduate, graduate, or prestigious studio programs. Posted by Melissa R (2008-05-31) 97 Having just graduated from a top conservatory program and seeing some of the work of my peers, I can attest to the fact that a prestigious degree does not guarantee talent. I have seen many performances from graduates of top schools that were forced, bombastic, out of place, or even selfish. My own experiences at school have occasionally made me question the value of my program and others. I am not wholly confident in my own work, and this lack of confidence has not always been assuaged by my work with my professors. Maybe I'm not the most competitive actor in the world, but maybe that's not what my undergrad training was for. Maybe it was to encourage me to be a student and help me be a professional.
What I can say is that I think an undergraduate acting degree from ANY audition-based program speaks to an actor's dedication to really learn a craft, rather than just fumble around in the dark without losing face. A degree from a reputable program goes a step further, implying that an actor is familiar with certain basic tenets of theatre and performance, as well as possessing an awareness of available vocal and physical choices (this is REALLY important and something that is not innate even in the most talented) and a basic vocabulary with which to work. More than this, though, a degree from any of the schools discussed, as well as some others (I would suggest CCM or Ithaca), shows again that dedication to challenge oneself and accept the criticism that one certainly gets in such a program and to work with it, not against it. Acting is the most competitive business besides professional sports, and I think the main criterion for success is unflinching dedication. The other thing that a program like mine can do is expose a young actor to the wealth of information out there. When I entered school, I naively thought I'd be set to be a great actor at the end of four years. Now I know I'll be in classes the rest of my life, and that'll still only get me the tip of the iceberg. Training isn't everything, though. Plenty of the best actors have no relevant degree, but they dedicated themselves in other ways, and I guarantee they met with rejection, criticism, and other harsh conditions for which a degree would have prepared them. My feeling is that actors who are able to find success without a training program--those who have been able to "train on the job"--are either the luckiest or the hardiest of the bunch (and maybe both). Hats off to them... in the meantime, I'll take my diploma. Posted by E.M. (2008-06-06) 98 While the Rutgers BFA program is supposed to be good, I would read about the Rutgers MFA Acting program. Its a look into their unethical behavior and why it might not be the best graduate school for you to attend. Posted by d.b. (2008-08-05) 178 I've read certain places that USC is among the top schools for acting. Is this accurate, and does it compare to these others? Posted by Joe D (2008-08-25) 292 Before going into any BFA acting program, the question to ask is it really worth it. Posted by dennis (2008-11-12) 551 If acting is something that you get into because you want to try your hand at fame and fortune, then no, it's probably not worth it. But if acting is a passion and is something that you do to feed your soul and give meaning to your life, then yes, it is absolutely worth it. Posted by T.C (2009-01-31) 953 What about University of the Arts in Philadelphia, or Marymount Manhattan (in Manhattan). I have heard that they also have competitive and well-respected bfa programs in acting. Posted by LK (2009-02-27) 1062 UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA UCLA Posted by Sean (2009-03-31) 1229 Anyone in California knows that UCLA is WAY better than UCSD or UCSC for undergraduate Acting. The program gets 1600 applicants for 25 spaces.
UCSD and UCI are great for Graduate Level *MFA* But UCLA is better than CalArts, USC and all other west coast schools for undergraduate acting. In fact, The Princeton Review & The Gourman Report ranked UCLA as #1 in the country in their last publication Posted by mike (2009-03-31) 1230 I think this list is very accurate I have just recently been through the whole process of auditioning and have learned a lot about all the schools and what they CURRENTLY offer and their CURRENT strength. I would have to say with what I know I believe the program at SUNY Purchase is currently becoming less and less prestigious due to budget cuts and a lack of talent. The campus is also very unattractive. The faculty has changed. In fact, the head of the faculty and majority of the faculty that worked at Purchase during its days of glory in the 80s and 90s have all moved on elsewhere. Many in fact have moved to Mason Gross at Rutgers including Israel Hicks the former head of the Purchase program and Current head of the Rutgers program. Now, I have been extremely educated in this field over the last year have seen productions or clips or students act from all of these schools. I currently can say with 100% integrity that Juilliard, Rutgers, and Carnegie currently house the best acting programs. No ifs ands or buts. These programs are flourishing and producing incredible graduates. I would actually say for the current undergraduate student that Rutgers holds the best program - if you like the Meisner and teachings of esper that is. But the school gives its students enormous opportunities and unique, fundamental, pivotal, intriguing, and crucial work that most of these schools lack to a degree. The top five programs in no order are Juilliard, Rutgers, Carnegie Mellon, Purchase, and NCSA. These schools currently lead the way with the most successful and talented grads in the country. Especially Juilliard, Rutgers, and Carnegie. Posted by Jessecb (2009-04-09) 1266 Current List after talking to many people in the business...
1. Juilliard 2. Rutgers 3. Carnegie Mellon 4. SUNY Purchase 5. North Carolina School of the Arts 6. Boston University 7. University of Minnesota - Guthrie Actor Training Program 8. California Institute of the Arts 9. New York University 10. DePaul University 11. Emerson College 12. University of Southern California BA Programs: Yale, Fordham, Northwestern (can turn into BFA) Posted by Heise (2009-04-09) 1267 I am a current freshmen at Purchase and am trying to transfer because it is BAD! 6 other students from my class "tried" to transfer as well... The school is NOT I repeat NOT providing its students with the proper facilities training and overall a good acting education... I along with others feel deprived and I wish I would've made another choice last year... DO NOT COME here, the state is cutting the budget and making it hard for the program to do anything... Overall, this is just my opinion, but the program is DEFINITELY NOT the number one... I agree with the post above but maybe move Purchase below NCSA. Posted by NoPurchase (2009-04-17) 1319 Hey,
I actually have began to hear much from people in the business that Juilliard is a more of a NAME than it is a good PROGRAM. Of course the training received is good... But I just do not know if it is the BEST without a doubt school for acting. Is it really? Or are we all just saying this because it has the name "Juilliard" tagged to it? I would say that you cannot give any program the NUMBER ONE spot. They are all different and impossible to rank... SO, with that said, I would conclude that Juilliard, Rutgers, and Carnegie have to be the 3 top programs. In no order. And then so on and so on... You cannot tag numbers to them though. Posted by Je tellie (2009-05-01) 1388 It’s no use fighting over which is the best acting school and which offers the great acting programs. The bottom line is that whether you are either a bad actor with deep pocket or a good one without it, having one of these ‘prestigious’ institutions on your resume does help in the end. The bad actors will rule themselves out at some point, while good ones will survive. Resilience, dedication, perseverance are important words.
Posted by Allan Jacob (2009-05-07) 1416 As someone who knows about the program at Purchase I would say it is still one of the best. Yes, the faculty had changed and the chair but they are back and stronger then ever. I just saw a group of their second years in a show and they were brilliant. The work that is going on at that still is just breathe taking. Posted by Lloyd Smith (2009-06-15) 1585 Jessecb - I would have to say you are false about SUNY Purchase. The new faculty members at Purchase which includes Lisa Benavides-Nelson, Charles Tuthill, J. Allen Suddeth and Christopher McCann are some of the most known teachers and working professionals in the New York industry. The chair A. Dean Irby has taken over the program and transformed it into something great. Budget cuts are happening every were. At every top acting program in the country. Julliard recently had 20 percent of their budget cut this year .. so what does that tell you? We are in a recession people.
The point is Purchase has an amazing faculty and hungry, driven and beautiful students. The work that is being done at that program is great. Those students know how to make something out of nothing. No, its not glamorous and all that jazz but its REAL. Real artist are being made at that program. Just like at CMU, Juilliard and Rutgers. Posted by Jasmine (2009-06-16) 1588 I believe it is impossible to put a number next to any of these programs... I agree to a degree (KEY WORD: DEGREE) with all of you. I think it is foolish to argue over which program is the best... They all produce wonderfully talented and great actors each year. Any student should be more than grateful to attend any of them... But with that said, It looks like we can all agree that CMU, Rutgers - MGSA, Juilliard, and Purchase all have wonderful programs... Probably the best four in the country... And we are incapable of ranking them. We can just know they are the "best." Posted by IZZYNyc (2009-06-25) 1657 RUTGERS - MASON GROSS BFA ACTING is the best program - and I don't even go there. I just think what they are doing there is incredible! Posted by Casey Anderson (2009-07-02) 1712 I agree - Meisner is by far the most respected teaching method in the country. I wouldn't even consider it a "technique" it is so much more of a way to allow yourself as an actor to let the scene do you instead of doing the scene. Act from the soul rather than your mind... THAT is the essence of acting. Because that is how life happens. Posted by Dylan McCarthur (2009-07-11) 1755 I agree as well... But I think we can all still agree pegging these programs one over the other is just nonsense. Fantastic actors have emerged from all of them. Though it would be easy to say a students best bet would be to gain admittance to Juilliard, Rutgers, Purchase, or Carnegie. I have visited all four programs and have seen brilliance in the students work at each compared to others (NYU, NCSA, DePaul...) Posted by Shawn Gross (2009-07-11) 1756 In response to B.Ryder's post... I know this was written back in 2007... But BU accepts 100 acting majors! Most of them don't come so they usually end up with around 40-50 and then as the years go on they cut it down... So to gain admittance is not competitive at all. Also, Northwestern, NYU, and Rutgers are on completely different levels. Rutgers houses a fantastic program on the same level as Juilliard and Carnegie...etc and although the school is strong with liberal arts it is a conservatory program and therefore it is just like Carnegie, Purchase... etc. I think you must have been confused about that. Northwestern and NYU have two unique programs that aren't like anything else and Academia comes into play MUCH more when considering who to admit than any other school. Northwestern requires no audition and NYU only accepts students who are academically at the normal standards of NYU - Hence you get kids who are very smart, not necessarily the most talented... BUT some of them are because they accept 300. Rutgers accepts 18-20. BIG DIFFERENCE. Posted by Olinda Giamani (2009-07-11) 1757 In response to Olinda Giamani's post...Although BU does accept 100 to yield to 40-50, about 800 students audition for the acting program. I would say a 1 in 8 chance is very competitive, although it isn't as competitive to get into some other programs like CMU or Juilliard. Posted by TJC (2009-07-13) 1766 I am a teacher a very well respected arts high school out east. Every year we update our students with the best knowledge of what the top programs currently are. In fact, a few agencies that we have connections with that attend all the showcases usually create a list of what they believe the current top ten programs are. They then share this knowledge with us so we can pass it on to our students who will be applying in the coming year. This is helpful information and we do see it change slightly year to year. They base the ranking completely on their opinions of the talent at the showcase, the professionalism of the students, and the work the students are offered through the showcase. After talking with them this year the list they have created looks like this....
1. Juilliard 2. Rutgers MGSA 3. Carnegie Mellon 4. SUNY Purchase 5. North Carolina 6. Boston University 7. CalArts 8. NYU Tisch ... There are more to the list, however I do not have it with me and this is all I can remember. Best wishes to you all. Posted by Suzanne Stein (2009-08-02) 1877 Ignore user No Purchase's comment. They wrote that because they were asked to leave in the Freshman year due to a lack of professional conduct. The Acting program at Purchase is one of the best- if you are dedicated enough to grow and do the work. Posted by Current Student. (2009-08-08) 1907 I hear the programs at Juilluard, Purchase, Rutgers and CMU are great. I would say this is correct :) Posted by Alexander Jones (2009-08-24) 2003 Under the honorable mentions, the "University of Indiana at Evansville" does not exist. The theatre program he refers to is The University of Evansville, which is located in Evansville, Indiana. It is a private university with no affiliation with any other Indiana school. Posted by Evansville (2009-08-31) 2034 chicago conservatory should be on this list. Posted by student (2009-09-24) 2120 . "Junior students in Acting spend a year abroad at the Rutgers Conservatory at Shakespeare's Globe in London. This is the only BFA program which offers sequential conservatory training in London."
This is completely false because Syracuse University offers all of their BFA Acting and Musical Theater an opportunity to study abroad in London for a semester and work professionally with Shakespearean actors in the Globe Theater. You also put on your own Shakespearean production and perform in the Globe. Syracuse also has a program called Tepper which sends second semester senior BFA students to New York City to work and train with the best casting agents and directors in the city. You take master classes and audition for the entire semester in front of casting directors. In addition, Syracuse puts on a production called "Showcase" at the end of the year for second semester seniors only. They only accept 20 MT and Acting majors into the showcase and the students perform individually and with scene partners in front of successful casting directors and agents. Its an amazing program! Definitely one of the best in the country Posted by Katherine (2009-10-21) 2152 Katherine...
Rutgers Mason Gross School of the Arts' acting program is currently regarded as one of the top three if not, top two acting programs in the country. Rutgers has a direct partnership with the Globe Theatre unlike any other program and the students do not just spend a semester working there, BUT an entire year! Londoners that work and live around the Globe are apparently excited every year for the new Rutgers students to come and show them some world class acting. My friend goes to this program so I have heard these things. Really though, the partnership Rutgers has with the Globe is very unique - something that is very special and no other school in the world currently offers that kind of connection. There are a lot of programs that take kids to London for a semester for some general studies and acting classes and the opportunity to study abroad. Rutgers program abroad is much more complex and intricate due to its very intimate partnership with the globe. Also, having a showcase doesn't make Syracuse very special due to the fact that pretty much every notable bfa program has one. Posted by Juni (2009-10-25) 2157 To the next person or people who leaves a blog please tell me what you think about temple's university's theater program and what other training one should seek after graduating from there if the graduate is going to be at least 26 when he finishes. And are acting workshops at places like stella adler, and hb studios really worth it. And does anyone know how good sft (school of film and television).
Thank you. I would consider trying to go to julliard or Suny purchase after graduation but i would be to old so any advice you could offer would help Posted by Paper (2009-11-02) 2171 My daughter (a HS Senior) has visited acting programs since Aug 2008 (and attended classes where permitted) at SUNY Purchase, Juilliard, NCSA, Marymount Manhattan, Tisch, & others. The exceptional, personalized attention and accessibility that Marymount has offered are second to none! The tour, visits, acting classes & whole experience was what one would hope for when investing soooooooo much effort, time, study & $ on an education. Yes, in some situations, it really does "take a village"....and in my daughter's college search...IT DOES!!! My daughter also is currently working to save for her college tuition! I am a Social Worker & never dreamed I would have a daughter compelled to act & destined to a life in the theatre!!! She has also educated me to understand the magnitude of what theatre brings to one's life (including mine!) & that this is her life's passion and essentially who she is!!! As a parent, I could not ask for a more professional, nurturing and realistic approach than what we have experienced at Marymount (the visits, the classes, the follow-up phone calls, & the friends she has made during the visits) concerning her chosen field and also the personalized attention, advice, and coaching offered by the Marymount program. I am amazed and astounded that on the Upper East Side, 2009, a young adult, aspiring actor, can find such a place as Marymount who welcomes the challenge to nurture the whole person, actor, student in such a way that gives a parent, a piece of mind,...everything will be ok with this child of mine who needs/desires to act...& cannot imagine anything else in her life-and for her life.
From Nicole in Admissions to David Mold's Acting Class (Feb. 2009), the Thoroughly Modern Millie production (Mar. 2009) that also inspired our daughter...from Allison, the tour guide (Class of 2009) to Ian, the graduate (2009) who both still communicate via Facebook with my daughter, encouraging her along the way through the audition process. Thank You Marymount Manhattan from a mother's whole heart... Others...take note! Posted by "NotSoStageMumsy" (2009-11-10) 2178 Hi guys, I am from Western Michigan University's Theatre Department and we are among the top undergrad theatre programs in the US. We have a highly acclaimed Musical Theatre Performance, Theatre Performance, and Design and Technical Production Department. We are currently working on recruiting people into our department, and I think you should absolutely check it out! GO TO www.wmich.edu/theatre to see production photos, student life information, class schedules, audition information, season tickets, and more. Posted by Leandra Watson (2009-11-20) 2196 How does the Pitzer College theatre program rate among the programs mentioned? Posted by Henry (2009-11-26) 2208 Auditioners this year 2010 are saying the following...
1. Juilliard 2. Rutgers 3. Carnegie Mellon 4. SUNY Purchase 5. North Carolina School for the Arts 6. U of Minnesota Guthrie 7. Boston University 8. USC 9. Cal Arts 10. NYU Tisch Posted by Hoffstaz (2010-02-16) 2353 I have studied at Mason Gross for a month for acting in a program called RSAC (Rutgers Summer Acting Conservatory) and I can definitely say that although I was only there for one month, this rigorous and amazing conservatory training has been unparalleled anywhere else I have studied so far. I have seen shows from Julliard, Rutgers, and Carnegie Mellon, and although they were all simply amazing, I must say that the BFA actors over at Mason Gross just left the other schools with dust in their eyes from how advanced and simple their moment to moment spontaneity and genuine truthfulness was. Don't get me wrong, the other schools are pretty effing amazing, but Mason Gross is top. Posted by Jerzmonz (2010-02-16) 2356 I have ben a working actor for 30 years, and done 140 professional plays, and a fair amount of TV. The fact is I have never worked with an untrained actor... usually from a very good school with a track record of excellent training, and a roster of working graduates. Of course, someone can have a natural talent for Baseball, or surgery, but you can't do it without honing your skills with great teachers. The fact that someone can point out a handful of exceptions adds to the myth of the "discovered actor". I wouldn't bet on that myth. It is a gross disservice to excellent teachers to suggest that they don't make a difference. Like excellence in other area, they tend to be noticed, and then tend to be recruited to good schools. This does not mean that other schools don't also have good teachers, but it really MUST be a conservatory program that demands voice/speech, mvmt, every day...and then dialect, fight training, scene work, acting... with a competative entrance requirement so that the group challenges and demands excellence of each other. The fact that there are some bad students from good schools is a childish thing to point out in addressing the worth of a school. Acting well is very difficult, requires years of focus, and tremendous skills...if not, more than one in 7000 people who wish to do it would succeed. Generally, the schools you hear about are the better schools...I know, because I work with them. Posted by Todd Waite (2010-02-22) 2385 You don't have to have a degree.. these people don't and it worked for them.
Sally Field Leonardo DiCaprio Whoopi Goldberg Kate Winslet Robert De Niro Patrick Dempsey Claire Danes Rosario Dawson Noel Coward Kevin Connolly George Carlin James Cameron Michael Caine Ellen Burnstyn Marlon Brando Drew Barrymore Kate Beckinsale Christina Appelgate Jennifer Anniston Woody Allen Edward Albee Ben Affleck Halle Berry Sean Penn Brad Pitt Matt Damon Tommy Lee Jones Jason Statham Gerard Butler Clint Eastwood Posted by Noel (2010-03-04) 2409 What advice would you give to someone who is old(er), has spent the past 20 years as a doctor, but would like to act professionally with NO fall back? I would like to transition from treating patients to acting. Would you go back to school to do it? Should I go back and get a BFA? If not how would you start? What would you do? Posted by D. McMinn (2010-03-05) 2410 To D. McMinn:
Congratulations on your decision to become a professional actor. Yes. Go back to school and study. Like Todd Waite said on this thread: "Of course, someone can have a natural talent for Baseball, or surgery, but you can't do it without honing your skills with great teachers." I would recommend looking into the top acting schools, check their requirements and get going. This is a champion buisness and you can't be an "OK" actor. You must be brilliant to succeed. Top 5 BFA Acting Schools are: Mason Gross School of the Arts Julliard Carnegie Mellon Boston University North Carolina School of the Arts Good Luck and be brilliant! Posted by Jeff Sanchez (2010-03-07) 2413 Mason Gross School of the Arts is definitely the best out of all. What they teach there is amazing. Posted by Jonathan Mathews (2010-03-19) 2437 I'm really surprised where NYU and Univ. Minnesota/Guthrie are on the lists. I've heard that they both have incredible programs. Any comments??? Posted by Andrew Taton (2010-04-01) 2458 "Graduates of the University of Evansville are consistently the best prepared to enter and to succeed in the most demanding MFA programs in the United States."
- Ron Van Lieu, Chair, Graduate Acting Program, Yale School of Drama They are also ALL OVER film and TV right now. If you are looking for intense and excellent acting training AND a complete liberal arts academic education (actors should live and learn as much as they can about the world they live in), this is the place. Another major draw to U.E. is their secondary campus in ENGLAND. My semester there was one of the most formative, enlightening and amazing experiences of my life and has greatly shaped the course of my career as an entertainment professional. p.s. U.E. is not part of the University of Indiana system. Posted by LL (2010-04-04) 2461 LL if you could message me about Evansville, that would be great. I was acepted there as a performance major, and am now trying to make decisions...thanks! Posted by SKS (2010-04-04) 2462 Who cares who's the best! Go get your training and worry about longevity. All of these places can prepare you for the industry. Get to work and stop thinking about which school is the best. Posted by Student (2010-04-20) 2488 okay so big thing here.... A BFA PROGRAM IS NOT EVERYTHING... Who are the best actors of our time? DO THEY HAVE BFAs? NO. NO NO NO. Who even has a BFA... The whole degree has become a middle class convention of acting and I hate it. Go to school kids. GO TO SCHOOL for something. Get a degree... maybe get an MFA... maybe take classes outside of school. The most powerful actors I see do not have a bfa. The degree is an infantile shortcut to someting no one should take a shortcut too. And how can we rate these schools either? Really, are we gonna say who is the best? To do so is so naive and ignorant. Art is subjective. Every one has their OWN PROCESS independent of what I beleive any school can teach. A school just offers tools... Showcases are pointless and and overrated. the whole system is anti-artistic. Posted by JJ Hopkins (2010-04-24) 2492 JJ Hopkins:
I must disagree with you. Although it is true that these powerful actors do not have BFA acting degrees, it doesn't mean that the "system" is anti-artistic. The degrees offered at these programs are meant to provide you with work (And they have- some examples include Sebastian Stan, Aaron Stanford etc.) If you get lucky, you'll land some big-budget TV show or film. Almost all of these recognized actors just got lucky, that doesn't mean that they are necessarily better than anybody else. BFA degrees are just proof that you have become skilled at your talent, skilled enough to work in the business. I agree with you that everyone has their own process, however everyone can only learn that process by either creating their own technique somehow, or by going to school and branching off of other techniques. The schools are rated, unfortunately, but these schools are all GREAT programs. There isn't really one top school. I believe that if you want to go to a great school, do your research on all of them, and see which one best fits you. These are, however, the schools that have been getting the most buzz lately, based on their graduating students and faculty: Rutgers Mason Gross School of the Arts Carnegie Mellon School of Drama North Carolina School of the Arts The Juilliard School Drama Division SUNY Purchase Conservatory of Theatre Arts & Film By no means, people, does this mean that these schools are the perfect fit for you. Like I said before, do your research on them all. Posted by Andrew Stantham (2010-05-09) 2512 Hi everyone -- are people still following this thread? I'm wondering if anyone knows about the quality of the undergraduate acting BA at Penn State (regular acting -- not the musical theatre program). It is a small program and by audition only, but I don't know what's its reputation is in the business.
Thanks in advance! Posted by Ruth (2010-05-12) 2520 ok i just grad from high school and am looking for the best and mostly succesful acting flim college ..i love acting and i want to learn more..am hoping to find the right school and get started ..many of my high school mates have believe i can do it cuz i put alot of work on my acting but other think i cant..i want to prove them wrong but i need help looking for the best school that will actually help me learn and grow up in the acting film life Posted by bruno (2010-05-14) 2523 ABOUT BOSTON UNIVERSITY
I'm currently an acting major at Boston University. I feel as though our program really is not getting the attention it deserves, not in the professional world but as a viable program to study in. First of all, speaking from experience, having BU on your resume really gets you noticed. It has opened up many opportunities for me. Both faculty and alumni are continuing to garner respect for our program. As for the program itself, there is no better community for what we do. Unlike most of the "prestigious" schools, there is no pressure to really show results. We are encouraged to learn at our own pace, with the understanding that what we get out of it corresponds with what we put in. However, instead of creating a lax/lazy atmosphere, they focus on igniting our passions for the theatre as a whole which is a very driving force. There is absolutely no feeling of competition between the students. Our utmost priority is to create a safe, supportive place where we can explore our creativity fully and without fear. The faculty members are wonderful and knowledgeable, and they become incredibly invested in each one of their students. They do anything they can to help and support us, but make sure we can sustain ourselves artistically once we graduate. Also, they are all working members of Boston's theatre community, working with the ART, Huntington Theatre Co., and others, including BCAP which is a new professional company grown out of the school. Because of this, they give incredible opportunities to their students. For example, three of my classmates were asked to perform substantial supporting roles in Othello with the ART. That's a prime credit to have on your resume. The abroad program is extensive. You can basically study where ever you want, from LAMDA and RAADA to Arretzo. A recent graduate worked in Sydney under the direction of Cate Blanchette. Lastly, we are given two options as far as majors. In my opinion, the greatest part of this program is it gives you everything you need to be a collaborative theatre artist, with award winning playwrights, directors, and actors on the faculty. The theatre arts majors can really follow their hearts in exploring whatever interests them about theatre with the ability to build their own program while keeping up with their acting training. The acting majors certainly don't lose much of that roundedness and still have many opportunities to expand, but are given a strong progression in acting. Basically, BU gives you top-notch acting training, opens a lot of doors, and gives you the tools you need to create your own opportunities and be a strong collaborator in the theatre community. Not only that, it cultivates a real love for the art of theatre, which I believe will be great fuel for the rest of my career. I went their with the idea that I was in it for myself, for the attention and celebrity of being an actor. I now believe that theatre is so much more important than me and is truly worth devoting my life to Posted by Nick Dawson (2010-05-21) 2551 I have to agree with JJ Hopkins: The whole debate seems to not matter much. I went to Syracuse University School of Drama and, while it has opened a few doors of opportunity, it's nothing I couldn't have arranged with a little grit and determination.
It IS something of a middle-class convention to think that the right BFA program can put you on the fast track. This isn't communications or business school we're talking about. Art is subjective. And some of the best actors of all time never had a bachelors. What's more important is that those four years enriched my life more than I could enunciate. And not only the acting training (which was absolutely excellent by the way) but the whole experience. Attend a school where you think you'll learn and thrive. And Juni, it's true: I only got to study at the Globe for one semester. Your friend got to study for an entire year. Impressive. Still, I got to study at the Globe because Syracuse ALSO has a unique relationship with the Shakespeare Globe, and it was the best four months of my life. I'm sure Mason Gross is nice too. Posted by Adam (2010-06-10) 2580 Boston University sounds nice. What is the word on UT Austin? It was on the Honorable Mention list and has produced some great actors. Posted by Nate (2010-06-18) 2594 Not everyone can attend the prestigious schools you mention above. Are there other schools that will give you the skills you need to become an actor? My son is very interested in sketch comedy along the lines of Second City or Saturday Night Live. He has already attended an Academy for Performing Arts while in High School. He enjoys all types of acting but has a penchant for comedy. He is interested in attending Columbia College Chicago due to their affiliation with Second City. However, he wants to continue to get excellent training in all areas of acting. Will this school provide that?
Posted by Sheryl (2010-08-30) 2690 Post Your Comments No HTML, links, emails, phone numbers, addresses, or profanities please. (Message Rules) |
|
|||||